Archflow
Product Guide

Decisions

Review architecture findings, risks, debt, suggestions, and what-if ideas

Decisions is the review queue for AI-assisted findings. Each item includes its evidence, affected architecture elements, proposed action, and lifecycle state.

Decisions page with recommendation evidence and review queue

Decision Types

TypePurpose
Card assignmentSuggest an Architecture Card for an element, relationship, or workflow
Card removalRemove a card that no longer fits the evidence
Documentation gapIdentify missing or thin documentation
Architecture concernSurface a structural or operational concern
Pattern identifiedRecord a recognizable architectural pattern
NFR riskFlag a quality-attribute risk
What-if ideaPropose a forward-looking improvement, optionally grounded in Data Model evidence
Risk findingPromote a reviewed risk into the Architecture Handbook
Technical-debt findingPromote reviewed debt into the Handbook
Decision suggestionCreate a proposed ADR for formal team review

Lifecycle

StateMeaning
Needs reviewWaiting for a person to evaluate it
ApplyingThe approved side effects are in progress
Needs reconciliationApplication was interrupted and must be resumed or reconciled
AcknowledgedAn advisory finding was accepted without a model mutation
AppliedThe approved change completed
DismissedThe finding was rejected with optional feedback
ExpiredThe review window ended before action

Review Workflow

  1. Confirm the selected project version.
  2. Filter by state, type, severity, affected elements, or confidence.
  3. Read the reasoning and cited project evidence.
  4. Discuss ambiguous tradeoffs with Archie.
  5. Apply an actionable item, acknowledge an advisory item, or dismiss weak evidence.
  6. Resume safely when an item needs reconciliation rather than creating a duplicate change.
  7. Promote durable conclusions into the Handbook or Project Knowledge.

Approving a risk, technical-debt item, or decision suggestion does not make the suggestion unquestionable. It creates structured Handbook material that the team should continue to govern.

Generation And Cost Control

Analysis is debounced and deduplicated so rapid model edits do not create a storm of equivalent findings. Project-level reviews and scheduled analysis operate on bounded project evidence. What-if ideation runs less frequently than routine per-entity analysis.

On this page